28 U.S.C. SECTION 351 TO 364 GIVES JUDGES PERMISSION TO MAKE DELIBERATE WRONG DECISIONS

For over 200 years, we the people have suffered, slavery, black code law, seperate but equal, civil right movement and more from a law hidden in the rules and regulations of judicial misconduct proceedings under 28 U.S.C. Section 351 to 364. This law gives judges the sole permission to  make wrong decisions even very wrong decisions so long as they commit this wrong in their judicial capacity. 100% of the wrong is committed in their judicial capacity, acting under color of any law! This is why the judges are rarley being held accountable. Giving judges permission to make wrong decisions is not true appellate error. its a crime. See http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/crm/242fin.php  It conflicts with civil right laws. Its unconstitutional because we have no rule of law to rely upon. These judges are suppose to make what they believe to be correct decisions even if its wrong. Thats true appellate error. Let the Government come into compliance with the Magna Carta and the Declaration of Independence.

So far, i received 964.800  likes on facbook and counting dealing with this petition.   The truth is our sheild and buckler. Who's more Powerful then God? Read Deuteronomy, chapter 16, verse 18 to 20. Its God's will this change be made. Because like Dr. Martin Luther king said in his last sermon on earth, the cashing of our check dealing with inherent rights is coming back insufficient funds...til this day, this holds true!

Lets say for instance a jduge makes a wrong decision because hes commiting bribes under the table, receiving 100.000. In this case, if caught, he will be held accountable in criminal court. Lose his job all that. But take the bribe away. And lets just use the wrong decision on the merits. Your judicial misconduct complaint will be dismissed. The wrong decision will continue and maybe rubber stamp by appellate court and supreme court. United States supreme court may deny you with no reason behind it.

In their judicial misconduct procedures, their not distinguishing the difference between deliberate wrong decisions and unintentional wrong decisions. They treating both of it the same as appellate error. Newark Nj, the year 2010. I walk into the Newark Nj federal court house and filed a 42 U.S.C. section 1985(3) Complaint. This complaint was handed to a clerk of court. The complaint was against Federal court judge Stanley R. Chesler and family court Judge Bernsteinet.al. Two months later. I find this clerk never filed nor docket my complaint at all. This same clerk claimed i never gave her any complaint.

But then i showed her a stamped filed complaint that she did receive it with a date. She caredless what i showed her. And still claim she don't have my complaint. So i filed a judicial misconduct complaint with the Chief judge in the appellate court against Stanley R. Chesler.  He sat on my judicial misconduct complaint for 6 months and then he  Filed and docket my civil right complaint i had as an attachment. And then ruled on my judicial misconduct complaint the same day, dismissing it. He claims related to the merits of the case. When he filed the 1985 complaint he assigned me a judge outside nj but still within the judicial circuit court. One hour after this judge was assign, he dismissed my complaint before i had a chance to say one word. I resued these judges. Summons was served this time. The clerk certified an answer needs to be made or be in default. They never answered. They went in default. But the federal court, covered up and dismissed the case again. 

 In the appellate court. on many of times, i will take the time to put a brief together showing exhibits and appendix. But when the court rule. None of my words are ever considered. Tha appellate court would site the trial court order verbatim and rubber stamp. Not considering a word i said.The United States Supreme Court, Im literally asking them for clarification of my inherent rights under due process, their required! But on Sept 2013, i was denied without a reason signed by clerk Higgins saying one word in the whole document, denied! The kids in concern is still til this day being held by Judge Bernstein and no trial has been had til this day in family court on clear and convinceing.

I Declare! You do not have to be a lawyer to understand these three case laws:

Here you have this caselaw: Bustamante v. District Court of Third Judicial Dist. :: 1958 ... and this case law: Jaben v. United States :: 381 U.S. 214 (1965) :: Justia US ... Running totlally contrary to this caselaw: Higgins v. People, 868 P.2d 371 - CourtListener.com all because of 28 U.S.C. Section 351 To 365. Given judges permission to make deliberate wrong decision. That law must be repealed and rewritten to protect the nation as a whole Magna Carta., Moral turpitude, The Ought! And finnaly Natual Law! In 1997 I won my right to release from a male judge. . But a nother judge, a female judge on the same day overruled  dismiss my habeas corpus without giving me any opportunity to respond.
30 F3d 141 Higgins v. D Rovira Mac R M Rw Ce J | OpenJurist  The Original decision on the merits is found nowhere. Til this day, my case is time barred and this government owe me. But you continue to use this caselaw to harm the public: Higgins v. People, 868 P.2d 371 - CourtListener.com

Corrupt rulings don't just have to apply in your particular case. It can also apply in your particular city or state. The legislative regulates that single and familly gets cash assistence on walfare. But a corrupt ruling that suppose to interpret law not create law will change the legislative scheme and require only familys to receive cash assistence. What you going to do about it?  Nothing! But this judge just placed himself as a legislator and created law! What about your kids under the uniform family of support act. Under clear and convincing, the government must prove the allegations they used to take your kids out of their home dealing with abuse and neglect or give them back. But a higher court  judge issued a court ruling that says in the best interest of the child, a mental health doctors can declare the mother unfit regardless of the reason they took your kids. This can be done without recording of the mental health interview or peer review. They want you to trust them that you are unfit to care for your child. Acting under color of any law! What you going to do about it? Nothing! Unless you sign this petition. Im a nobody to you people! So if you don't want to listen to me. Listen to this federal court judge:

 

Part two: http://youtu.be/aWxFP1XDHCs

http://dontvotegasaway.com/

The contest is not between Us and Them, but between Good and Evil", and if those who would fight Evil adopt the ways of evil evil wins. 

You, Yolanda Punkin Mosby and 964,999 others like this.Yolanda Punkin Mosby, Ruby Solomon and 964,998 others like this.
                                                               
You, Brik Kryme and 965,016 others like this.Brik Kryme, Angie Salomon Diaz-Cervo and 965,015 others like this.
  • Joseph Higgins
  • Brik Kryme
  • Angie Salomon Diaz-Cervo
  • Sally Blades
  • Lusciouss Lori
  • Steph Jones
  • Nadine Peake
  • Erika Da UndaBoss Shawdy
  • Yolanda Punkin Mosby
  • Ruby Solomon
  • Denise K Griffin
  • Author GiGi Elder
  • Bubbo Jones
  • Joseph Higgins
  • Yolanda Punkin Mosby
  • Ruby Solomon
  • Nadine Peake
  • Angie Salomon Diaz-Cervo
  • Bubbo Jones
  • Lusciouss Lori
  • Steph Jones
  • Erika Da UndaBoss Shawdy
  • Denise K Griffin
  • Author GiGi Elder
  • Brik Kryme
  • Sally Blades
Sign Petition
Sign Petition
You have JavaScript disabled. Without it, our site might not function properly.

See our privacy policy.

By signing, you accept Care2's terms of service and agree to receive communications about our campaigns through email and other methods. You can unsub at any time here.

Having problems signing this? Let us know.