Remind the California judiciary that they must remain unbiased, allow due process, and stop favoriti

The fraudclosure crisis is not new news. We have been hearing about it for years now. However, with the slow crawl of lawsuits within the judicial system, it is likely to be a news topic for a while.What has not become a topic of news, however, is the seeming prejudice displayed by many judges, when corporations with deep pockets draw out the procedure - using underhanded and sometimes illegal tactics. It often seems that judges are more than happy to slap fighting homeowners and their attorneys with sanctions, but do not hold the corporations to follow the same rules of the law. There have been several cases in which judges have actually told the homeowners' attorneys that they "have all the evidence needed" from the mortgage companies - companies known to use robosigning, forgery of signatures and/or initials, and wet stamps, as well as other deceptive practices already well-documented.The fact that corporations have discovered a loophole that, upon foreclosure, they change their status from lender on the properties to "landlord", and take homeowners to court on an Unlawful Detainer action ("eviction"), forcing people to appear in front of judges unfamiliar with wrongful foreclosure laws and hearing these cases using actual "landlord/renter" laws to administer their decision, is ridiculous. It's ridiculous because, in UD court, whoever holds the title is considered the owner - even if the homeowner can prove they obtained the title fraudulently, illegally, or hold imperfect title, the judges almost always side with the Corporations on that basis only.
This forces homeowners to fight a battle on two fronts, in two differing courts of law. And they are not getting a fair shake in either one. When did the justice system start administering law on behalf of corporations only?Ms. Harris, we appeal to you to continue your good work on our behalf and have a conversation with the judges and magistrates of the California judicial system, to remind them to remain impartial, to hear all evidence, and to require the same standard of conduct from both sides.