JoCo Family Court Judge Violation of KS Criminal Statute 10.18.23 KSA 21-5907

Family Court Judge Paul Burmaster knowingly crossed a Kansas Criminal Statute KSA 21-5907 (Simulating Legal Process) on October 18, 2023 in a civil custody case of 18CV03813, involving two minor children. And the Judge did it with a DV Protection Order from 22CV03391. Can you see the problem right off the top, a case record of Notice of Protection Order is required under KSA 60-31a08 in this State every time a protection order is served to a defendant. A case record for 22CV03391 cannot be created in case 18CV03813. The certified and authenticated hearing transcripts of the custody case contain page 10, and the judge specifically cites that he did not attach two elements of the protection order together like the forms from the Kansas Judicial Council directs on the forms of Protection Orders. And the biggest red flag here, is a judge should never have to issue the same protection order twice within 90 days, as it did on August 10, and then again with 22CV03391. It actually cannot happen. It either flies or fails when a judge issues a Protection Order. It failed on Aug 10, and on October 18, 2023, the order had failed and could not be re-issued because it terminated itself. Any reasonable person can see the transcript of the hearing and deduce that a second time indicates a first time failure and it's the judge who essentially speaks of his own failure. The Crime occurred when the Judge on Oct 18, 2023 states, let "the record reflect" that Mr. ********** is being served that today, but it was too late and the judge gave me, old August dated documents of a failed order but just stapled together to make me believe that a court order was just 'fixed' when served onto me and then I would take reliance of an action or non action because of that misrepresenting paperwork.
And that is the definition of KSA 21-5907 1-5907. Simulating legal process. (a) Simulating legal process is:
(1) Distributing to another any document which simulates or purports to be, or is designed to cause others to believe it to be, a summons, petition, complaint or other legal process, with the intent to mislead the recipient and cause the recipient to take action in reliance thereon; or
(2) printing or distributing any such document, knowing that it shall be so used.
(b) Simulating legal process is a class A nonperson misdemeanor.
That was a crime by a family court judge of weaponization of a purported Domestic Violence Court Order. That is serious criminal behavior, and if he did it to me, how many others is he doing it to.
The Kansas Bureau of Investigation has taken report 8 days ago via SAR online reporting.
The Kansas Attorney General Public Protection Office
has taken a Kansas Open Records Act complaint 24 days ago from the Fact that on October 18, when the "record was alleged to be reflected" in the transcripts, there should be able to reprint that process Service but they can't, it was simulated. And I asked the Attorney General to get a copy for me please under KORA and the court has not produced a copy for the AG and the complaint is still probing. But I know they don't have it because I requested a copy first and was declined by Johnson co and it's my order! KORA violation.
But we all know it is 2024, and things and ethics are no longer paramount. There is a gas light being ignited by a few agencies and the proper course of action is public pressure to uphold the Laws of Kansas unequivocally.
Hence, this petition. Take a look, there's over 1000 children under the jurisdiction of Paul Burmaster and that is why a petition like this is so important to be reviewed.
I speak for those children without a voice, that we must hold our elected officials to full accountability.